One of the great failings of the mainstream news media in America is their sparse and superficial coverage of religion.Religion is an important factor in the lives of millions of Americans, but you wouldn't know it from the little ink and air-time it gets from the secular media.
Most daily newspapers have got whole departments full of reporters and editors who deal with nothing but sports, while only one staffer, if any, is assigned to the religion beat -- and then, usually on a part-time basis.
You would think that the media, if only in their own economic self-interest, would provide more coverage of the faith-based communities in their circulation areas. I'm talking about objective and comprehensive coverage that goes beyond the handouts issued by houses of worship, and beyond stories about the conspicuous political wrangles over abortion, school prayer and embryonic stem-cell research.
There's a whole world of religious trends, theological controversies and intra-denominational goings-on out there, but the mainstream media pay most of them no attention at all. What a shame. What a missed opportunity.
I've always felt that a weekly magazine devoted to objective coverage of religion in America would be wildly popular and thus greatly profitable. You could call it ReligionWeek or some such thing. It probably would be denounced in some quarters and might regularly find itself embroiled in heated controversy, but that's all right. People would read it.
Yes, we've already got countless religious publications and TV and radio programs, but they're all preaching to their respective choirs. There's no place for people to go for detached coverage of the real news in religion.
This subject comes to mind with the release this week of a new study by Media Matters for America, which shows that the secular news media give an unbalanced picture of religion by devoting too much time and space to the views of religious conservatives. Read it. It's an eye-opener.
8 comments:
One question, though, Rascal. Aside from the events of the various churches/denominations/what have you, wouldn't any real objective coverage of religion have to address the issue that you can't prove any of it and most of it seems pretty crazy. I mean, whether you like sports or not, you can argue that the game actually took place. Most religion? That's another matter.
I would bet the market for a magazine about religions aimed at people who aren't particularly religious is pretty small.
Religious people are interested in their particular brand of religion, not the phenomena of religious thought.
To Will and Mike: Oh ye of little faith!
Imagine the controversy and boycotts of advertisers if you actually covered religion objectively. You'd be offending some group, in their eyes, with every issue. Just look at how radical Islamists and the Christian right react to any criticism or objective analysis. Come to think of it, you probably would sell a lot of magazines with all that publicity.
Yeah, those radical Islamists are likely to not buy your product and the Christian right might riot worldwide or try to kill you. I wouldn't want to offend either of those.
"Imagine the controversy and boycotts of advertisers if you actually covered religion objectively."
Yeah, it would be just the like if the Democratic candidates planned on having their debate hosted on Fox.
Mike, you seem to have a problem with the English language. Perhaps a dictionary would help.
whatever dude
Post a Comment